Official Website of Dijo Thomas

 

         
Personal Details Media Human Rights Who - Attacking Dijo Thomas?
           
Quotes   Chupacabra Activism & Important Issues Blog-of-DijoThomas Contact

 

Dijo Thomas Proves that Chupacabra Exists in American Continent !! | .......................................... Dijo Thomas Scientifically Proves Chupacabra !

 

Dijo Thomas solves one of the Two Biggest Mysteries [ along with Yethi - the Himalayan snow man / Big Foot] in the World - Is Chupacabra Fake or Real ?

Scientist & Wildlife Conservationist Dijo Thomas has already Proved Scientifically that Raktha Athika {Vampire Kangaroo} is a New Species & a New Family.

 

 

 

¦ This is a Real Picture of Chupacabra in Kerala, India ; which has been Named Raktha Athika
{ Blood Sucker } !

 

 

Proofs that Chupacabra Exists ( in brief ) ::

1. Food: Raktha Athika Drinks the blood of Goats & Chicken.

Food: Chupacabra Drinks the blood of Goats & Chicken.

2. Raktha Athika: Two holes on the neck of the prey.

Same Features are found in the Victims of Chupacabra.

3. Raktha Athika Do not eat Flesh.

Chupacabra Do not eat Flesh.

4. Photo and Description of Chupacabra is very SIMILAR to that of Raktha Athika. { Now the video which I saw in 2016 in Youtube, has been delated. But someone will have a copy. Pls upload that & send it to me}

5. Nature of Hair is same for Both Raktha Athika & Chupacabra !

 

There is are many More Similarities between Raktha Athika & Chupacabra.

 

Raktha Athika has been Scientifically Proven by Dijo Thomas in 2016 !

Chupacabra has also been Proven by Dijo Thomas in early 2017 !


 

YouTube


Documentary | English

Does Chupacabra Really Exist ! Scientist and Conservation Biologist Scientifically
Proves that Chupacabra Really Exists !


https://youtu.be/S_mK9gWkpc4

..........................................................................................


2. English | ViewReal Chupacabra/ Raktha Athika Video- Discovered &
ScientificallyProvedBy Dijo Thomas.

ACV News Special Report .


https://youtu.be/G-M28lAlhRI

 


 


Chupacabra Really Exists in America !


Scientifically Proven by Dijo Thomas from 15,000 Kms away in 2017 !


But How did the American Scientists go Terribily Wrong on Chupacabra ?

....................................................................................................................................................................................



Chupacabra will More or Less Look Like Raktha Athika in this Picture !
Raktha Athika [ Vampire Kangaroo ]
(Pron: Rek-tha Ya-thi-ka) is a Newly Discovered Species ;
a Blood Drinking Mammal that was obtained in a Cage in Pavaratty, Thrissur, Kerala, India in June
2016 !
Raktha Athika Family is Closely Related to Macropodidae Family, ie. Kangaroo Family.
Chupacabra is the Second Species in Raktha Athika Family !
....................................................................................................................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................................................................
..... How the American Scientists, went TERRIBLY WRONG on Chupacabra ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA is one of the Main POINTS that the Scientists in
America Went TERRIBLY WRONG on Chupacabra .


Plainly, They Were NOT ABLE to Differentiate and Properly Find Out The NATURE of the HAIR
on CHUPACABRA and It's Difference with Other Mammals .


But this is NOT the Only Point, where, the American Scientists, went Wrong !


Infact, on MOST of the MAIN POINTS , the American Scientists, went TERRIBLY WRONG on
Chupacabra !


2. Just Because the American Scientists Got Only the Body of a Coyote with Mange ; they "
ASSUMED " that " All the Sightings of Numerous People were Only Coyotes ???


? I would Say that, it was a Very Foolish Way of Proving the Non-existance of Chupacabra !
?? But No-Body Till this Moment, Thought of This Important Point ;
and as a Result, No-Body Till this Moment said about this Fact ?
?? As a Result , it Got Widely Accepted that Chupacabra Doesn't Exist !


?? 3. Though there is Bound to be Many False Eyewitnesses, the American Scientists , Again "
ASSUMED That " All Eyewitnesses are Wrong ! Which, Now is Evident, were Not !


?? 4. ?? Eyewitnesses are Very Important in Any Discovery ; Differentiating Between the Real
and Wrong Eyewitnesses is Very Important !
?? American Scientists Failed in this also.


?? 5. In August 2016 , I saw a Video of a Real Chupacabra, sitting in a Cage in American
Continent in YouTube. ( But I Don't see that Video in YouTube Now. )
?? American Scientists Failed again to Properly Understand the UNIQUENESS of the
Morphological Features of the Chupacabra Obtained in a Cage !


........................................................................................................................................................................................


Thus an Important and Rare Wild Animal , CHUPACABRA , which ; was Wrongly Assumed to
be NON-EXISTANT by the American Scientists ?


This Mistake by American Scientists have a Big Negative Impact for the Conservation of one
of the Most Important Species in the World, the CHUPACABRA ?

........................................................................................................................................................................................


Finally that Task Of Scientifically Proving Chupacabra , also fell on the Shoulders of Dijo
Thomas , from 15,000 /- Kms away
?
........................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................


The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika


The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is ----- ITS NATURAL
CONDITION !


¦ The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is , Again , Similar to that of
HUMANS , Than that of Other Mammals like Felines, Cannids, Hyaenidaes, Viverrids or Even
Other Primates !!!
?? If You Observe Very Closely, You Can See that ? the NATURE of the HAIR on Raktha Athika
is Very Long, ---- Infact Extremely Long for Any Mammals ---- , but very Thin ( You can barely see it
in the photo, unless You closely observe ), Semi - Curly and Not at all Strong ?
?? The NATURE of the HAIR on Raktha Athika is in Sharp Contrast to Other Mammals like
Felines, Cannids, Hyaenidaes, Viverrids - which are Mostly Short and Strong ;
And Very Different from Other Primates !!
?? The Above Evidences, Stated by Dijo Thomas, Clearly Proves that The NATURE of the HAIR
on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is NOT BECAUSE of Mange !


........................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................


Read More :


1. Read More on Raktha Athika ( Vampire Kangaroo ) :
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=557050902140594&id=100035070674792
( Detailed )


2. Dijo Thomas solves one of the Two Biggest Mysteries [ along with Yethi - the Himalayan
snow man / Big Foot] in the World - Is Chupacabra Fake or Real ?
( In Nutshell )
http://wildlifescientist.com/DijoThomas-Proves-Chupacabra.htm


3. Documentary | English ( Detailed )
?? ?? Is Chupacabra in America Real or Fake? Scientist Dijo Thomas Proves Chupacabra Exists!
Documentary

https://youtu.be/S_mK9gWkpc4
......................................................................................................................................................................................



What American Scientists said.

And How they went Terribily Wrong !!


Is Chupacabra in America real or fake?


There is a lot of Controversy on Chupacabra. Finally some scientists, including Benjamin
Radford, said it is only coyotes, dogs or raccoons – who lost their hair owing to sarcoptic
mange.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/101028-chupacabra-evolution-halloween
-science-monsters-chupacabras-picture
:


The University of Michigan's OConnor speculates that the mite passed from humans
to domestic dogs, and then on to coyotes, foxes, and wolves in the wild.


The mites too have been evolving, suggested the University of Georgia's Keel.

 


 


Scientists believe legendary chupacabras monsters are actually coyotes with severe cases of
mange, like the animal pictured here.

 

But Scientist and Conservation Biologist says that they were Wrong, Patendedly, as they saw a few coyotes with severe cases of
mange, and Assumed that all the Chupacabra Sightings were coyotes with severe cases of
mange !

Dijo Thomas says that Eventhough Most of the cases could be coyotes with severe cases of
mange, the American Scientists Failed to Identify the REAL Cases of Chupacabra Sightings !!

 

Dijo Thomas have Also Identified the Following Cases in the picture below as Fake [ 1st pic ] and the other Two as other Mammals with severe cases of
mange ! These are Not Definetely Chupacabra, Says Dijo Thomas. But he also Says that , it CANNOT be Taken as a Proof that Chupacabra Doesn't Exist !!!

 

 

Dijo Thomas: "The fact that the samples they took for DNA tests were of coyotes, dogs or
raccoons, is Not a proof that there is No Chupacabra ! "

 

 

 

 Benjamin Radford Admits Defeat Before the Challenge of Dijo Thomas !!

   
 

By Not Accepting Repeated Challenge by Dijo Thomas;

For a Public Debate before Media ;

Over Dijo Thomas's Discovery and Scientific Proving of Raktha Athika, [ Indian Chupacabra ] &

Chupacabra in American Continent !

Read More ....

 

 


I Found Loren Coleman more Realistic.



Loren Coleman, director of the International Cryptozoology Museum in Portland, Maine, agreed
that many chupacabra sightings—especially the more recent ones—could be explained away as
appearances by mangy coyotes, dogs, and coyote-dog hybrids, or coydogs.
"It's certainly a good explanation," Coleman said, "but it doesn't mean it explains the whole
legend."


For example, the more than 200 original chupacabra reports from Puerto Rico in 1995 described
a decidedly uncanine creature.


"In 1995 chupacabras was understood to be a bipedal creature that was three feet [about a
meter] tall and covered in short gray hair, with spikes out of its back," Coleman said.
But, as if in a game of telephone, the description of the chupacabra began to change in the late
1990s due to mistakes and mistranslations in news reports, he said.
By 2000 the original chupacabra had been largely replaced by the new, canine one. What was
seen as a bipedal creature now stalks livestock on all fours.
"It was actually a big mistake," Coleman said.


"Because of the whole confusion—with most of the media reporting chupacabras now as dogs
or coyotes with mange—you really don't even hear any good reports from Puerto Rico or Brazil
anymore like you did in the early days. Those reports have disappeared and the reports of canids
with mange have increased."

 



 

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2011-03-31-ct-met-kass-0331-20110331-story
.html

Chicago Tribune


Don't let science suck the life out of Chupacabra story
John Kass

March 31, 2011


Once again, the cynics are going out of their way to debunk the existence of the Chupacabra, the
hairless, bloodsucking vampire, or goat sucker, as it is affectionately called.
As millions of Americans know, it often sidles up to its victims, then rises on its naked haunches,
before it feeds.


But now comes Benjamin Radford, managing editor of something called Skeptical Inquirer
science magazine. His aim? To debunk the noble creature.
"I would say it's no more or no less as real as Santa Claus," Radford recently told KRQE, an
Albuquerque, N.M., TV station.
Really, Mr. Radford? How sad. How nauseating. How utterly predictable.
And how positively dangerous for American taxpayers, if Mr. Radford and his cynics are able to
convince us there's no such thing as a bloodsucker.


Let me tell you something, mister. As a newspaperman who often deals with politicians, I can tell
you for a fact that Chupacabras do exist. I've seen them hard at work, drawing nourishment from
millions upon millions of defenseless beings, gorging while making happy noises deep in their
throats.
And if you ever caught them feeding and dared try to stop them, they'd probably pull a Sen.
Chuck Schumer on you and call a news conference to shriek that those who would deny them
nourishment are being "unreasonable" and "too extreme"!
Yes, the Chupacabras are often vicious. And yes, it is also true that for years I've wished to own
one as a pet, to keep on a silver chain for my amusement.
But Radford isn't interested in what I want. He's the author of a new book, "Tracking the
Chupacabra," as if I'll ever purchase a volume.


Radford, whom I have absolutely no intention of ever interviewing in my lifetime, wasted five
precious years of his life hoping to trace the roots of the beast.
The reason?
He wanted to find the source of it, in the hopes of killing it in our collective mind, and thus
rendering it extinct.
"It doesn't matter what I write," whined Radford to ABC recently. "It doesn't matter that I solve
this. People are still going to see a weird hairless thing, and someone is going to call it a
Chupacabra."
Or perhaps they'll call it a Schumer.


Radford says people like mysteries and have been fascinated by the idea of a beast that sucks
goats' blood. "It captures the public's imagination," he said.
His quest begins with Ms. Chupacabra herself, Madelyne Tolentino, of Puerto Rico.
In 1995, Tolentino stunned the world by saying she'd spotted the vampire near her home. She
described the creature as a biped, about 3 to 5 feet tall, with red or black eyes, skinny arms and
spikes down the back. The Chupacabra had no ears and had small air holes instead of a nose.
The story aired in 1995 on "Cristina" — the Oprah Winfrey of Spanish-language television.
And soon, Chupacabra sightings popped up in Puerto Rico. Later the beasts were spotted
elsewhere in Latin America, and the southwestern United States. Two were thought to have been
shot dead in Texas in 2010, but these turned out to be dogs who lost their hair to strange mites.
Weirdly enough, no Chupacabra has ever been officially spotted in Washington, D.C., perhaps
because they blend in so easily with all the other bloodsucking creatures.


Naturally, Radford also blames the media for promoting the Chupacabra phenomenon.
So, as his story goes, he interviewed Tolentino and got her to reveal a damning "fact":
That shortly before she confessed to seeing the Chupacabra in 1995, she'd seen the sci-fi
movie "Species." The descriptions, he said, of the creature in "Species" and her "post-Species"
Chupacabra were more than coincidental.
"To me," Radford was quoted as saying, "that was the smoking gun. It can't be coincidence, but
this Chupacabra that's now popping up around the world just happened to look exactly like the
monster in the sci-fi film."
Perhaps.


According to the equally credible Wikipedia, the film starring fine actors like Ben
Kingsley and Forest Whitaker, "is about a group of scientists who try to track down and trap a
killer alien seductress before she successfully mates with a human male."
The statuesque and somewhat blond Natasha Henstridge is the alien, who wears sexy clothes
including (as I vaguely remember it) a skin-tight black cat suit. And she's also quite deadly in
bed.


But in the interest of accuracy, I consulted the IMDb website, which offered the following review,
which "30 of 37 people found helpful."
"For some reason, a quality cast … signed up for this knockabout trash about an escaped
alien-human hybrid in a search of a mate … and is little more than an excuse for a few car chases
and many sightings of Natasha Henstridge's (bosoms)."
This may be, but focusing on Henstridge's anatomy and her female-preying-mantis-mating ritual
is a complete distraction. It's also a red herring.


But it's just the kind of thing that a devious creature like the Chupacabra, and its most eager
manservant, Mr. Benjamin Radford, would want us to believe.
The thing is, there is absolutely no scientific proof that just because Ms. Chupacabra watched
"Species," that she also didn't see a freaky Chupacabra outside her home a couple of weeks later.
Chupacabras are indeed tricky beasts. And their greatest trick is convincing people that they're
not real.
But they always leave their tracks. Just look at your tax bill, and tell me they don't exist.


jskass@tribune.com
..........................................................................................

 


Please Read WildlifeScientist.com > Raktha Athika { Indian Chupacabra } to get more idea on how Dijo Thomas Scientifically Proved Chupacabra & Raktha Athika through F3B-NSPM Method !


 

Despite the many Blunders by American Scientists , Dijo Thomas went on to Prove Chupacabra in America through Raktha Athika !

That too Scientifically , through F3B-NSPM Method !

 



 

 

 

..........Media Reports

 

 

Report in Deccan Chronicle Daily?, a prominent Indian News Paper & the most trusted English Newspaper in India, on 16 Nov 2019 regarding the Discovery & Scientific Proving of Raktha Athika, the Vampire Kangaroo, in Thrissur dist of Kerala

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 


 

Front PageReport in Dina Malar, the Second Largest Circulated News Paper in Tamil Nadu on 13 Nov 19 .

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 


News Paper Reports

Media - Back Cover Page Report in Mangalam Daily, a prominent Kerala News Paper, on Raktha Adhika on 24 Aug 16.

 

 


 

Media - Report in Back Cover Page of Kerala Kaumudi Daily, a prominent Kerala News Paper, on Raktha Adhika on 09 Sep 16.

 

 

 


 

 


 

 

 

 


 

 

Dijo Thomas

1. Nature Website: WildlifeScientist.com

2. DijoThomas.com


4. Blog: DijoThomasOfficial.blogspot.com [View the latest Updates in this blog [even before they are published in our Main website WildlifeScientist.com

DijoThomas.Wordpress.com


 

         
Personal Details Media Human Rights Who - Attacking Dijo Thomas?
           
Quotes   Chupacabra Activism & Important Issues Blog-of-DijoThomas Contact