Official
Website of Dijo Thomas |
Dijo Thomas Proves that Chupacabra Exists in American Continent
!! | ..........................................
Dijo Thomas Scientifically
Proves Chupacabra ! |
Dijo Thomas solves one of the Two Biggest Mysteries [ along with
Yethi - the Himalayan snow man / Big Foot] in the World - Is
Chupacabra Fake or Real ?
Scientist & Wildlife Conservationist Dijo Thomas has already
Proved
Scientifically
that Raktha Athika {Vampire
Kangaroo} is
a New Species & a New Family.
¦ This is a Real Picture of Chupacabra in Kerala, India ; which
has been Named Raktha Athika
{ Blood Sucker } !
Proofs
that Chupacabra Exists ( in brief ) ::
1.
Food: Raktha Athika Drinks the blood of Goats & Chicken.
Food:
Chupacabra
Drinks the blood of Goats & Chicken.
2.
Raktha Athika: Two holes on the neck of the prey.
Same
Features are found in the Victims of Chupacabra.
3.
Raktha Athika Do not eat Flesh.
Chupacabra
Do not eat Flesh.
4.
Photo and Description of Chupacabra
is very SIMILAR to that of Raktha Athika. { Now the video
which I saw in 2016 in Youtube, has been delated. But someone will
have a copy. Pls upload that & send it to me}
5.
Nature of Hair is same for Both Raktha Athika &
Chupacabra !
There is are many More Similarities between Raktha Athika
& Chupacabra.
Raktha
Athika has been Scientifically Proven by Dijo Thomas in 2016 !
Chupacabra
has also been Proven by Dijo Thomas in early 2017 !
YouTube
Documentary
| English
Does Chupacabra Really Exist ! Scientist and Conservation Biologist
Scientifically
Proves that Chupacabra Really Exists !
https://youtu.be/S_mK9gWkpc4
..........................................................................................
2. English | ViewReal Chupacabra/
Raktha Athika Video- Discovered &
ScientificallyProvedBy Dijo Thomas.
ACV News Special Report .
https://youtu.be/G-M28lAlhRI
Chupacabra Really Exists in America
!
Scientifically Proven by Dijo Thomas from 15,000 Kms away in 2017
!
But How did
the American Scientists go Terribily Wrong on Chupacabra ?
....................................................................................................................................................................................
Chupacabra will More or Less Look Like Raktha Athika in
this Picture !
Raktha Athika [ Vampire Kangaroo ]
(Pron: Rek-tha Ya-thi-ka) is a Newly Discovered Species ;
a Blood Drinking Mammal that was obtained in a Cage in Pavaratty,
Thrissur, Kerala, India in June
2016 !
Raktha Athika Family is Closely Related to Macropodidae Family,
ie. Kangaroo Family.
Chupacabra is the Second Species in Raktha Athika Family !
....................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................
.....
How the American Scientists, went
TERRIBLY WRONG on Chupacabra ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA is one of the Main POINTS that
the Scientists in
America Went TERRIBLY WRONG on Chupacabra .
Plainly, They Were NOT ABLE to Differentiate and Properly Find Out
The NATURE of the HAIR
on CHUPACABRA and It's Difference with Other Mammals .
But this is NOT the Only Point, where, the American Scientists,
went Wrong !
Infact, on MOST of the MAIN POINTS , the American Scientists, went
TERRIBLY WRONG on
Chupacabra !
 2. Just
Because the American Scientists Got Only the Body of a Coyote with
Mange ; they "
ASSUMED " that " All the Sightings of Numerous People
were Only Coyotes ???
? I would Say that, it was a Very Foolish Way of Proving the Non-existance
of Chupacabra !
?? But No-Body Till this Moment, Thought of This Important Point
;
and as a Result, No-Body Till this Moment said about this Fact ?
?? As a Result , it Got Widely Accepted that Chupacabra Doesn't
Exist !
?? 3. Though there is Bound to be Many False Eyewitnesses, the American
Scientists , Again "
ASSUMED That " All Eyewitnesses are Wrong ! Which, Now is Evident,
were Not !
?? 4. ?? Eyewitnesses are Very Important in Any Discovery ; Differentiating
Between the Real
and Wrong Eyewitnesses is Very Important !
?? American Scientists Failed in this also.
?? 5. In August 2016 , I saw a Video of a Real Chupacabra, sitting
in a Cage in American
Continent in YouTube. ( But I Don't see that Video in YouTube Now.
)
?? American Scientists Failed again to Properly Understand the UNIQUENESS
of the
Morphological Features of the Chupacabra Obtained in a Cage !
........................................................................................................................................................................................
Thus an Important and Rare Wild Animal , CHUPACABRA
, which ; was Wrongly Assumed to
be NON-EXISTANT by the American Scientists ?
This Mistake by American Scientists have a Big Negative Impact for
the Conservation of one
of the Most Important Species in the World, the CHUPACABRA ?
........................................................................................................................................................................................
Finally that Task Of Scientifically Proving Chupacabra ,
also fell on the Shoulders of Dijo
Thomas , from 15,000 /- Kms away ?
........................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................
The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika
The
NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is ----- ITS
NATURAL
CONDITION !
¦ The NATURE of the HAIR on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is , Again
, Similar to that of
HUMANS , Than that of Other Mammals like Felines, Cannids, Hyaenidaes,
Viverrids or Even
Other Primates !!!
?? If You Observe Very Closely, You Can See that ? the NATURE of
the HAIR on Raktha Athika
is Very Long, ---- Infact Extremely Long for Any Mammals ---- ,
but very Thin ( You can barely see it
in the photo, unless You closely observe ), Semi - Curly and Not
at all Strong ?
?? The NATURE of the HAIR on Raktha Athika is in Sharp Contrast
to Other Mammals like
Felines, Cannids, Hyaenidaes, Viverrids - which are Mostly Short
and Strong ;
And Very Different from Other Primates !!
?? The Above Evidences, Stated by Dijo Thomas, Clearly Proves that
The NATURE of the HAIR
on CHUPACABRA and Raktha Athika is NOT BECAUSE of Mange !
........................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................
Read More
:
1. Read More
on Raktha Athika ( Vampire Kangaroo ) :
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=557050902140594&id=100035070674792
( Detailed )
2. Dijo Thomas
solves one of the Two Biggest Mysteries [ along with Yethi - the
Himalayan
snow man / Big Foot] in the World - Is Chupacabra Fake or Real ?
( In Nutshell )
http://wildlifescientist.com/DijoThomas-Proves-Chupacabra.htm
3. Documentary
| English ( Detailed )
?? ?? Is Chupacabra in America Real or Fake? Scientist Dijo
Thomas Proves Chupacabra Exists!
Documentary
https://youtu.be/S_mK9gWkpc4
......................................................................................................................................................................................
What American Scientists said.
And How they went Terribily Wrong !!
Is Chupacabra in America real or fake?
There is a lot of Controversy on Chupacabra. Finally some scientists,
including Benjamin
Radford, said it is only coyotes, dogs or raccoons – who lost their
hair owing to sarcoptic
mange.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/101028-chupacabra-evolution-halloween
-science-monsters-chupacabras-picture :
The University of Michigan's OConnor speculates
that the mite passed from humans
to domestic dogs, and then on to coyotes, foxes, and wolves in the
wild.
The mites too have been evolving, suggested the University
of Georgia's Keel.
Scientists believe legendary chupacabras monsters are actually
coyotes with severe cases of
mange, like the animal pictured here.
But
Scientist and Conservation Biologist says that they were Wrong,
Patendedly, as they saw a few coyotes with severe cases of
mange, and Assumed that all the Chupacabra Sightings were coyotes
with severe cases of
mange !
Dijo
Thomas says that Eventhough Most of the cases could be coyotes with
severe cases of
mange, the American Scientists Failed to Identify the REAL Cases
of Chupacabra Sightings !!
Dijo Thomas have Also Identified the Following Cases in
the picture below as Fake [ 1st pic ] and the other Two as other
Mammals with severe cases of
mange ! These are Not Definetely Chupacabra, Says Dijo Thomas. But
he also Says that , it CANNOT be Taken as a Proof that Chupacabra
Doesn't Exist !!!
Dijo
Thomas: "The fact that the samples they took for DNA tests
were of coyotes, dogs or
raccoons, is Not a proof that there is No Chupacabra ! "
| |
Benjamin
Radford Admits Defeat Before the Challenge of Dijo Thomas
!! |
| |
Benjamin
Radford Admits the Discovery of Chupacabra by Dijo Thomas !! |
| |
By Not
Accepting Repeated Challenge by Dijo Thomas;
For a Public Debate before
Media ;
Over Dijo Thomas's Discovery
and Scientific Proving of Raktha Athika, [ Indian Chupacabra
] &
Chupacabra in American Continent
!
Read More ....
|
I Found Loren Coleman more Realistic.
Loren Coleman, director of the International Cryptozoology Museum
in Portland, Maine, agreed
that many chupacabra sightings—especially the more recent ones—could
be explained away as
appearances by mangy coyotes, dogs, and coyote-dog hybrids, or coydogs.
"It's certainly a good explanation," Coleman said, "but
it doesn't mean it explains the whole
legend."
For example, the more than 200 original chupacabra reports from
Puerto Rico in 1995 described
a decidedly uncanine creature.
"In 1995 chupacabras was understood to be a bipedal creature
that was three feet [about a
meter] tall and covered in short gray hair, with spikes out of its
back," Coleman said.
But, as if in a game of telephone, the description of the chupacabra
began to change in the late
1990s due to mistakes and mistranslations in news reports, he said.
By 2000 the original chupacabra had been largely replaced by the
new, canine one. What was
seen as a bipedal creature now stalks livestock on all fours.
"It was actually a big mistake," Coleman said.
"Because of the whole confusion—with most of the media reporting
chupacabras now as dogs
or coyotes with mange—you really don't even hear any good reports
from Puerto Rico or Brazil
anymore like you did in the early days. Those reports have disappeared
and the reports of canids
with mange have increased."
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2011-03-31-ct-met-kass-0331-20110331-story
.html
Chicago Tribune
Don't let science
suck the life out of Chupacabra story
John Kass
March 31, 2011
Once again, the cynics are going out of their way to debunk the
existence of the Chupacabra, the
hairless, bloodsucking vampire, or goat sucker, as it is affectionately
called.
As millions of Americans know, it often sidles up to its victims,
then rises on its naked haunches,
before it feeds.
But now comes Benjamin Radford, managing editor of something called
Skeptical Inquirer
science magazine. His aim? To debunk the noble creature.
"I would say it's no more or no less as real as Santa Claus,"
Radford recently told KRQE, an
Albuquerque, N.M., TV station.
Really, Mr. Radford? How sad. How nauseating. How utterly predictable.
And how positively dangerous for American taxpayers, if Mr. Radford
and his cynics are able to
convince us there's no such thing as a bloodsucker.
Let me tell you something, mister. As a newspaperman who often deals
with politicians, I can tell
you for a fact that Chupacabras do exist. I've seen them hard at
work, drawing nourishment from
millions upon millions of defenseless beings, gorging while making
happy noises deep in their
throats.
And if you ever caught them feeding and dared try to stop them,
they'd probably pull a Sen.
Chuck Schumer on you and call a news conference to shriek that those
who would deny them
nourishment are being "unreasonable" and "too extreme"!
Yes, the Chupacabras are often vicious. And yes, it is also true
that for years I've wished to own
one as a pet, to keep on a silver chain for my amusement.
But Radford isn't interested in what I want. He's the author of
a new book, "Tracking the
Chupacabra," as if I'll ever purchase a volume.
Radford, whom I have absolutely no intention of ever interviewing
in my lifetime, wasted five
precious years of his life hoping to trace the roots of the beast.
The reason?
He wanted to find the source of it, in the hopes of killing it in
our collective mind, and thus
rendering it extinct.
"It doesn't matter what I write," whined Radford to ABC
recently. "It doesn't matter that I solve
this. People are still going to see a weird hairless thing, and
someone is going to call it a
Chupacabra."
Or perhaps they'll call it a Schumer.
Radford says people like mysteries and have been fascinated by the
idea of a beast that sucks
goats' blood. "It captures the public's imagination,"
he said.
His quest begins with Ms. Chupacabra herself, Madelyne Tolentino,
of Puerto Rico.
In 1995, Tolentino stunned the world by saying she'd spotted the
vampire near her home. She
described the creature as a biped, about 3 to 5 feet tall, with
red or black eyes, skinny arms and
spikes down the back. The Chupacabra had no ears and had small air
holes instead of a nose.
The story aired in 1995 on "Cristina" — the Oprah Winfrey
of Spanish-language television.
And soon, Chupacabra sightings popped up in Puerto Rico. Later the
beasts were spotted
elsewhere in Latin America, and the southwestern United States.
Two were thought to have been
shot dead in Texas in 2010, but these turned out to be dogs who
lost their hair to strange mites.
Weirdly enough, no Chupacabra has ever been officially spotted in
Washington, D.C., perhaps
because they blend in so easily with all the other bloodsucking
creatures.
Naturally, Radford also blames the media for promoting the Chupacabra
phenomenon.
So, as his story goes, he interviewed Tolentino and got her to reveal
a damning "fact":
That shortly before she confessed to seeing the Chupacabra in 1995,
she'd seen the sci-fi
movie "Species." The descriptions, he said, of the creature
in "Species" and her "post-Species"
Chupacabra were more than coincidental.
"To me," Radford was quoted as saying, "that was
the smoking gun. It can't be coincidence, but
this Chupacabra that's now popping up around the world just happened
to look exactly like the
monster in the sci-fi film."
Perhaps.
According to the equally credible Wikipedia, the film starring fine
actors like Ben
Kingsley and Forest Whitaker, "is about a group of scientists
who try to track down and trap a
killer alien seductress before she successfully mates with a human
male."
The statuesque and somewhat blond Natasha Henstridge is the alien,
who wears sexy clothes
including (as I vaguely remember it) a skin-tight black cat suit.
And she's also quite deadly in
bed.
But in the interest of accuracy, I consulted the IMDb website, which
offered the following review,
which "30 of 37 people found helpful."
"For some reason, a quality cast … signed up for this knockabout
trash about an escaped
alien-human hybrid in a search of a mate … and is little more than
an excuse for a few car chases
and many sightings of Natasha Henstridge's (bosoms)."
This may be, but focusing on Henstridge's anatomy and her female-preying-mantis-mating
ritual
is a complete distraction. It's also a red herring.
But it's just the kind of thing that a devious creature like the
Chupacabra, and its most eager
manservant, Mr. Benjamin Radford, would want us to believe.
The thing is, there is absolutely no scientific proof that just
because Ms. Chupacabra watched
"Species," that she also didn't see a freaky Chupacabra
outside her home a couple of weeks later.
Chupacabras are indeed tricky beasts. And their greatest trick is
convincing people that they're
not real.
But they always leave their tracks. Just look at your tax bill,
and tell me they don't exist.
jskass@tribune.com
..........................................................................................
Please
Read WildlifeScientist.com > Raktha Athika { Indian Chupacabra
} to get more idea on how Dijo Thomas Scientifically Proved Chupacabra
& Raktha Athika through F3B-NSPM Method !
Despite the many Blunders by American Scientists , Dijo Thomas went
on to Prove Chupacabra in America through Raktha Athika !
That too Scientifically , through
F3B-NSPM Method !
Report
in Deccan Chronicle Daily?, a prominent Indian
News Paper & the most trusted English Newspaper in India, on
16 Nov 2019 regarding the Discovery & Scientific
Proving of Raktha
Athika, the Vampire Kangaroo, in Thrissur dist of Kerala
.
Front PageReport in Dina Malar, the Second Largest Circulated
News Paper in Tamil Nadu on 13 Nov 19 .
News
Paper Reports
Media - Back Cover Page Report in Mangalam
Daily, a prominent Kerala News Paper, on Raktha Adhika
on 24 Aug 16.
Media
- Report in Back Cover Page of Kerala Kaumudi
Daily, a prominent Kerala News Paper, on Raktha Adhika
on 09 Sep 16.
Dijo Thomas
1. Nature Website: WildlifeScientist.com
2. DijoThomas.com
4. Blog: DijoThomasOfficial.blogspot.com [View
the latest Updates in this blog [even
before they are published in our Main website
WildlifeScientist.com
DijoThomas.Wordpress.com
|
Articles
Home
Personal Details
Videos